Kali should never ever be recommended as a daily driver nor should it ever be used as one. It us a special use case operating system with network security type job roles in mind and should be ran on a standalone box or via USB live session. This goes along with multiple security focused distributions designed for network security and forensics.
I've posted an even number of FreeBSD and Kali Linux screenshots from, what I can tell, 3 different standalone machines all running the OS on metal used as daily drivers..
I used Debian before I started using FreeBSD almost 17 years ago and used Kali since it was BackTrack 5 from that same time frame, give or take.
Kali is nothing more than a Debian box with a Xfce DE loaded with Kali tools.
If I am going to be chastised again, people who do not want to be "computer guys" and hyperbole aside, my screenshots already posted of me dong so and your post quoted to preserve continuity, please explain why I should not be using Kali to justify it as a factual statement and not opinion stated as such.
FreeBSD isn't generally considered to be a desktop OS. Should I not be using it either?
I have a site teaching people who have never used the command line and actually want to be computer guys how to use FreeBSD. Is that inappropriate as well?
Edited by Trihexagonal, 08 February 2022 - 06:00 PM.